Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Publishing Credibility
How do we now determine the credibility of what's published - be it on-line or by more traditional methods?
Not too long ago, traditional educators expressed concerns about trusting anything that's on-line, but if this story's true (perhaps it's not, perhaps it another on-line scam), where does this leave the beliefs of those who still dislike the on-line medium.
Not too long ago, traditional educators expressed concerns about trusting anything that's on-line, but if this story's true (perhaps it's not, perhaps it another on-line scam), where does this leave the beliefs of those who still dislike the on-line medium.
Labels: credibility
Monday, May 18, 2009
Future of News & Business
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/05/17/future-of-news-and-b.html
"eventually someone will figure out a business model that works for online news. But it may take some time, and lots of outfits will fall by the wayside in the meantime. That's capitalism for you."
"eventually someone will figure out a business model that works for online news. But it may take some time, and lots of outfits will fall by the wayside in the meantime. That's capitalism for you."
Friday, May 01, 2009
Kennys New Book
Kenneth Fees new book - Delivering E-Learning: a complete strategy for design, application and assessment - was published on 03 April 2009, and is available on Amazon.
Some of the issue Kenny expects to be a bit controversial, and stir up some interest include:
1. A new way of understanding e-learning, as an approach that encompasses all new methods of learning utilising digital technology.
2. Identification of five distinct models of e-learning – and there may be more.
3. A matrix for considering the impact of different kinds of e-learning.
4. A call for more strategic thinking about e-learning.
5. Condemnation of techies for overuse of misleading jargon.
6. Condemnation of e-learning vendors for misleading clients and “vandalising the market”.
7. Dismissal of e-learning technology standards as largely irrelevant.
8. A new model for e-learning design – the “route map”.
Other interesting features of the book include: foreword by Bill McGrath; a “virtual round table” discussion; an illustrative project; a glossary of technical terms; consideration of how to evaluate e-learning; an annotated bibliography; and a look at what the future may hold.
Also, it seems that I get a mention!
Also of interest, it looks like Kennys re-introduced the "-".
Some of the issue Kenny expects to be a bit controversial, and stir up some interest include:
1. A new way of understanding e-learning, as an approach that encompasses all new methods of learning utilising digital technology.
2. Identification of five distinct models of e-learning – and there may be more.
3. A matrix for considering the impact of different kinds of e-learning.
4. A call for more strategic thinking about e-learning.
5. Condemnation of techies for overuse of misleading jargon.
6. Condemnation of e-learning vendors for misleading clients and “vandalising the market”.
7. Dismissal of e-learning technology standards as largely irrelevant.
8. A new model for e-learning design – the “route map”.
Other interesting features of the book include: foreword by Bill McGrath; a “virtual round table” discussion; an illustrative project; a glossary of technical terms; consideration of how to evaluate e-learning; an annotated bibliography; and a look at what the future may hold.
Also, it seems that I get a mention!
Also of interest, it looks like Kennys re-introduced the "-".
Labels: e-Learning, kenny fee

